Kelli and I were having a conversation about a friend the other day, and we wandered into the topic of what makes people become actors. It's the nature of such conversations to become reductive and oversimplified, but it's interesting and can be illuminating nonetheless. We decided that there are three main motivations that drive people to willingly make themselves a spectacle to other people.
The first is the "Love Me Do" actor. This is somebody who wants an affirmation that they are a valuable person by having people see them and praise them for their courage, brilliance, and sensitivity. The play becomes an opportunity for them to shine. This person is secretly more interested in the curtain call than any other part of the show. Also, the backstage drama is almost as important as the one that happens on stage, much to the chagrin of many a stage manager.
The second is the "Anyone but me" actor. These people are drawn to the stage because it is a place where they can not be themselves. For whatever reason, the self is not a good place to be, and so they try to find a place where they can be somebody else for a while. These actors often don't even really enjoy acting very much, and rarely feel good about their work. But it's better than the alternative. For a few brief hours a night, they can not be. They are often nice and hard working, but you can sense their burden, and often a sense of futility or fear.
The third type is the "Peter Pan" actor. They just want to play. As a kid, they loved make believe more than anything else, and never really got over the fact that you are expected to stop pretending once you hit puberty. So they are drawn to the stage by the chance to continue the wonderful games of imagination that were so captivating as children. Those that get paid to do it count themselves lucky that someone else is naive enough to give them money for something they would do for nothing.
Obviously, few people are all one of these: most actors have a combination of these factors, and I bet you almost every actor would identify themselves as number three. But in my experience, only a few, and they tend to be the ones people most like to work with, really have that love of play at the center of their work; where the play's the thing, and acting is not more about psychology than art. Some really can't help it - life has dealt them a crappy hand - and some would benefit from thinking about something bigger than themselves for a change.
Yeah, I'm a cranky old cynic. But actors are ridiculous creatures, aren't they? We kind of ask for it... and don't get me started on critics...